ログイン
Language:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 紀要類
  2. 国際学部紀要
  3. 第11巻2号

エスノメソドロジーの科学研究

https://bunkyo.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/3819
https://bunkyo.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/3819
39c8118e-e7ad-4416-a856-c61823733e31
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
BKSK110204.pdf BKSK110204.pdf (2.0 MB)
アイテムタイプ 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2011-11-29
タイトル
タイトル エスノメソドロジーの科学研究
タイトル
タイトル On Ethnomethodological Studies of Science
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
タイトル カナ
その他のタイトル エスノメソドロジー ノ カガク ケンキュウ
著者 椎野, 信雄

× 椎野, 信雄

椎野, 信雄

Search repository
著者
値 Shiino, Nobuo
所属機関
値 文教大学国際学部
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Various research programs in the "new" sociology of scientific knowledge emerged in the latter half of 1970s. British sociologists such as Barnes, Bloor, Mulkay, Collins and so forth were challenging the Mertonian functionalist sociology of science. The aim of the new sociology of scientific knowledge has been to investigate and explain the "contents" of scientific knowledge per se. Ethnomethodological studies of scientific practices were surrounded by the emergence of these "new" programs in social studies of science. Although ethnomethodological studies of science have often been understood without being distinguished from these "new" programs, it seems that ethnomethodological studies differ from these programs in their perspective on language, science and action.
 In spite of their commitments to a supposedly "radical" view of scientific knowledge, the new sociologies use some conventional social science terminologies and explanatory formulae, and seem caught in a trap concerning the usage of ordinary language in social science and philosophy. Garfinke's ethnomethodology appears to advocate a complete departure from these conventional views of language and science which the new programs have taken over. We will make sense of ethonomethodological studies of science by reviewing how ethonomethodology sees the "new" programs. In this paper we would like to leave a port to the sea of argumentation by regarding ethnomethodologist M. Lynch's studies of science as leading light.
 Ethnomethodology's agenda is, according to Lynch, to reconsider what it means to produce observations, descriptions and explanations of something "actual." Garfinkel's program is not interested in explaining scientific facts by reference to the social context of their production. The program does not try to construct comprehensive models of activities and institutions. Its objective is to examine how scientific works are produced from the disciplinary-specific Lebenswelt of scientific projects. The aim is not to explain "discovery" as a matter of "social construction" but to try to gain a better understanding of scientific work.
書誌情報 文教大学国際学部紀要
en : Journal of the Faculty of International Studies Bunkyo University

巻 11, 号 2, p. 23-42, 発行日 2001-02-01
出版者
出版者 文教大学
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 09173072
著者版フラグ
出版タイプ VoR
本文言語
値 日本語
ID
値 BKSK110204
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 15:58:27.893955
Show All versions

Share

Share
tweet

Cite as

Other

print

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX
  • ZIP

コミュニティ

確認

確認

確認


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3