@article{oai:bunkyo.repo.nii.ac.jp:00003827,
 author = {何, 鳴},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {文教大学国際学部紀要, Journal of the Faculty of International Studies Bunkyo University},
 month = {2001-07-01, 2011-11-29},
 note = {In recent precedents of International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the practice of Security Council (SC) of United Nation, they both act their jurisdiction over a same case. At some cases the political Jurisdiction of SC bars to legal proceedings of ICJ. There are not any rules about their separate function in international law, so it became an urgen problem of international law.
　The problem emergenend at the precedents of ICJ in 1960s. At "Certain Expenses Case" (1962) the problem was soft, because both ICJ and SC did not insistent their jurisdiction. But by the case ICJ have charlenged that even peace-keeing action of SC are not exclute. Legality of the peace-keeping action of SC can be (or should be) checked by judicial organ.
　In "Nicaragua Case" (1984) ICJ concluded to the problem: "The Council has functions of a political nature assigned to it, therefore the Court exercises purely judicial functions. Both organs can therefore perform their separate but complementary with respect to the same events."
　And in "Lockerbie Case" (1992) the separate function of ICJ and SC became a new and important problem: the judicial review by judicial organ like ICJ to the action of political organ like the action of peace-keeping of SC. there are not any rules about the judicial review, so it needs legal practice of ICJ to make laws with the practice.},
 pages = {17--33},
 title = {同一係争事件の解決における安全保障理事会と国際司法裁判所},
 volume = {12},
 year = {}
}