@article{oai:bunkyo.repo.nii.ac.jp:00006769,
 author = {齊藤, 功高},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {文教大学国際学部紀要, Journal of the Faculty of International Studies Bunkyo University},
 month = {2016-07-31},
 note = {The friendly settlement mechanism has a long history as a way of settling international disputes.
Traditionally, the friendly settlement mechanism is as a kind of mediation, and a third party has
mediated between the parties to the dispute. In international human rights law, it has been adopted
by the international human rights instruments such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights (ICCPR) and regional human rights treaties. For example, friendly settlement procedures are
included in ICCPR Article 41 (1) (e), the European Convention on Human Rights Article 38 (1) (b) and
the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights Article 48 (1) (f). However, in the Inter-American
Convention on Human Rights, it is not purely a mechanism for mediation by a third party, in the
end, it is a mechanism to attempt to settle the problems between the nation and victims on the side
of the victim. Therefore, this paper examines how the friendly settlement mechanism of the Inter-
American Commission on Human Rights is effective in regards to the relief of human rights violations
in accordance with the following contents.
1. The friendly settlement mechanism of the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights and its
grounds
2. Miskito case as the first friendly settlement
3. Authority of the friendly settlement procedures of the commission in the Rodríguez case and
the Caballero case
4. Problems of the friendly settlement mechanism
5. Changes in authority of the commission in the revision of Rules of Procedure of the Inter-
American Commission on Human Rights
6. Friendly settlement in recent years and its trends},
 pages = {19--38},
 title = {人権侵害と友好的解決の有効性 : 米州人権条約における友好的解決メカニズムを通して},
 volume = {27},
 year = {}
}