@article{oai:bunkyo.repo.nii.ac.jp:00006777,
 author = {齊藤, 功高},
 issue = {2},
 journal = {文教大学国際学部紀要, Journal of the Faculty of International Studies Bunkyo University},
 month = {2017-01-31},
 note = {Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter; Commission) can issue precautionary
measures to prevent serious and urgent human rights violations. By requesting them, Commission
can temporarily prevent deterioration of the human rights situation until it examines the petition in the
subsequent merits.
However, several OAS member countries have not thought that the precautionary measures
granted by Commission are binding, instead, they have regarded as only recommendations which
are not binding. Because there is no provision in the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights
directly for the authority of the precautionary measures granted by Commission even if there are
provisions of precautionary measures in the Commission’s Rules of Procedure.
Will all OAS member countries have an obligation to comply with the provision in the Commission’s
Rules of Procedure established by the Commission itself ?
I consider the legal basis of the precautionary measures of Commission in Chapter 1 and, in
Chapter 2, I analyze the examples of the request of precautionary measures and examine them
whether the precautionary measures have the nature of what have binding force or only the
recommendation in Chapter 3.},
 pages = {17--37},
 title = {米州人権委員会の予防措置とその実際},
 volume = {27},
 year = {}
}