@article{oai:bunkyo.repo.nii.ac.jp:00006815,
 author = {齊藤, 功高},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {文教大学国際学部紀要, Journal of the Faculty of International Studies Bunkyo University},
 month = {2017-07-31},
 note = {The basis on which the Inter-American Court of Human Rights can provide advisory opinions is
in Article 64 of the American Convention on Human Rights.
However, in the provision of Article 64, as there are ambiguous parts of the term, advisory
opinions were issued from the American States and the Inter-American Committee on Human Rights
over the relevant terms.
Matters related to that advisory opinion are (1) interpretation of “other treaties concerning the
protection of human rights in the American states” in paragraph 1 of Article 64, (2) competence of the
Inter-American Committee on Human Rights as an institution of OAS under paragraph 1 of Article 64,
(3) in paragraph 2 of Article 64, it is a matter of interpretation of “domestic law”.
Chapter 1 deals with the interpretation of “other treaties concerning the protection of human
rights in the American states” in paragraph 1 of Article 64 of the American Convention on Human
Rights. Chapter 2 discusses the issue of the competence of the Inter-American Committee on Human
Rights as an institution of OAS. Chapter 3 describes the interpretation of the “domestic law” under
paragraph 2 of Article 64 of the American Convention on Human Rights, and Chapter 4 deals with the
problems of the court’s interpretation rights under Article 64 of the American Convention on Human
Rights.},
 pages = {23--39},
 title = {米州人権条約64 条の解釈に関する米州人権裁判所の勧告的意見},
 volume = {28},
 year = {}
}