ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 紀要類
  2. 人間科学研究
  3. 第23号

非行性の認定(III) 実態調査 その1 非行性の理解

https://bunkyo.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/369
https://bunkyo.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/369
972da77d-42f1-441f-a8ac-63118e48744b
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
BKK0000245.pdf BKK0000245.pdf (62.2 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2009-11-20
タイトル
タイトル 非行性の認定(III) 実態調査 その1 非行性の理解
タイトル
タイトル Studies on Differentiating Delinquency (3rd Report) : Psychological Specialists' Opinions on Differentiating Delinquency : Part 1 Understanding of Delinquency
タイトル
タイトル ヒコウセイ ノ ニンテイ 3 ジッタイ チョウサ ソノ1 ヒコウセイ ノ リカイ
言語
言語 jpn
キーワード
主題 delinquency, degree of delinquency, psychological specialist
資源タイプ
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
著者 進藤, 眸

× 進藤, 眸

ja 進藤, 眸
文教大学人間科学部

en Shindo, Hitomi
Bunkyo University, Faculty of Human Science

Search repository
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 In order to discuss various factors which had been regarded as so-called bottleneck in attempting to unify the concept of delinquency, 315 psychological specialists in the field of juvenile delinquency(hereafter mentioned as PS), i.e. Juvenile Classification Officers, Family Court Social Investigators, and so forth, were surveyed.
The quesionnaire on differentiating delinquency was sent to PS by mail. Data from 74 PS who sent back the quesionnare, and answered all or almost all quesion items in it,were analyzed from following two aspects;
(1) What sort of opinions on differentiating delinquency should be supported by PS
(2) What sort of sub-factors composing of the degree of delinquency should be selected by PS
For reasons of space, results of analyses from the aspect(2)will be reported in next 4th report.
Main findings based on analyses from the aspect(1), were as follows;
(1) PS recognized the necessity of unifing the concept of delinquency, and understood that delinquency could be differentiated and composed of multidimension.
(2) PS recognized that delinquency had to be differenciated based on not only their practical experiences, but also their agreements, and that differentiating delinquency had to play an important role in practices of judging and correcting delinquents.
(3) Factor analysis among 25 quesion items which were concerned with PS' opinions on differentiating delinquency, was carried out, and 8 factors were extracted. 3 factors were regarded as important, and the first, second, and third factors were named "serious consideration of practical experiences", "utility in practical settings", and "contribution to corrections", respectively.
書誌情報 ja : 人間科学研究
en : Bulletin of Human Science

巻 23, p. 33-43, ページ数 11, 発行日 2001-12-01
出版者
出版者 文教大学
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 03882152
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
item_5_text_42
値 BKK0000245
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 17:09:29.574299
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3