WEKO3
インデックスリンク
アイテム
核軍縮交渉義務事件（マーシャル諸島共和国対英国）判決（先決的抗弁）の検討 : 核軍縮交渉義務の実現過程と国際司法裁判所の役割の視点から
https://bunkyo.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/6780
https://bunkyo.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/6780abe543be-0294-4140-b50f-1b52f1620c9e
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
BKSK270206 (628.1 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2018-04-02 | |||||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||||
| タイトル | 核軍縮交渉義務事件（マーシャル諸島共和国対英国）判決（先決的抗弁）の検討 : 核軍縮交渉義務の実現過程と国際司法裁判所の役割の視点から | |||||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||||
| タイトル | Examination of Judgements in the Cases Regarding Obligations Concerning Negotiations Relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament: From a Viewpoint of Realizing Process of Obligations to Negotiate Nuclear Disarmament and Role of the International Court of Justice | |||||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||||
| 著者 |
山田, 寿則
× 山田, 寿則
|
|||||||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||||||
| 内容記述 | On 5 October 2016, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) delivered its Judgments in the cases regarding Obligations concerning Negotiations relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament, instituted by the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) against nine Nuclear Powers in 2014. Defendants in those cases are three powers, India, Pakistan and the United Kingdom all of whom accepted the jurisdiction of the ICJ through their declarations under Article 36(2) of the ICJ statue. The Plaintiff, the RMI based its claim mainly on Article 6 of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and its corresponding customary rule, alleging a failure to fulfil obligations concerning negotiations relating to the cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament. This article exams those Judgements, considering its implications on realizing process of obligations to negotiate nuclear disarmament, and the role of the ICJ in nuclear disarmament. The ICJ has dealt with some issues regarding nuclear weapons so far like nuclear tests and legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons. In its 1996 Advisory Opinion the Court unanimously declared that “[t]here exists an obligation to pursue in good faith and bring to a conclusion negotiations leading to nuclear disarmament in all its aspects under strict and effective international control”. In the 2016 Judgments, however, the Court upholds the objection to jurisdiction raised by the Defendants, based on the absence of a dispute between the Parties, rejecting the complaint of the RMI. In doing so, it adopted the “awareness” test which would decrease in disputes rising but increase in new applications coming. Judges opposing to the decisions by the ICJ criticize strongly this point based on the judicial economy and the sound administration of justice. Through those judgments, the Court showed self-restraining attitude to its role in realizing process of obligations to negotiate nuclear disarmament. |
|||||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 文教大学国際学部紀要 en : Journal of the Faculty of International Studies Bunkyo University 巻 27, 号 2, p. 67-87, 発行日 2017-01-31 |
|||||||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||||||
| 出版者 | 文教大学 | |||||||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 09173072 | |||||||||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||||||
